Posts

Easy Riders: A Cultural Icon

Image
 The Black Pigeon speaks: Adding to this... I've always thought the modern biker culture is essentially a media creation from the days of Hollister to the shitty B rated biker movies of the 50's and 70's. Few culture phenomena are organic in this country. It's all a product. I love motorcycles and owned a few Harley's but the subculture are full of fucking idiots, so much so I sold them. My aunt's husband was in a notorious biker gang in the 70's and he looked like a living B rated biker movie. He was a mean mother-fucker that tried to "go straight." The decision to marry my aunt was against club rules. They tied him to a tree, beat him, left him for dead. He was always threatened from that day forward. Decorated Airforce veteran ruined and dead at 52 from alcoholism and heart disease. I knew someone that joined a club even after I warned him. He caught on quick and had too much of a moral compass and wouldn't do *something.* They kicked him o

Nature is Fascist

Wolves are predators by nature. There is no morality, they kill to eat. It’s a necessity. They have a strict social hierarchy. The Alpha male and female lead the pack. Their survival strategy is pack cooperation and heavily depends on the pack hierarchy. During the hunt they strategize to attack the weakest member of the herd. Their prey may be weak or old. After the kill, all pack members eat, but conflict can arise if the hierarchy isn’t followed. A younger male may challenge the alpha male before or after the hunt. The pack will always need an alpha, he knows he will be challenged and if he fails the challenge his time as alpha is over. A lone wolf has reduced ability to survive and joining another pack means he will be placed in the hierarchy unless he can successfully defeat the alpha. There is no fairness, he accepts his role or is rejected. He meets the needs of the pack or he remains alone. It is not in the interest of the pack to attack the strongest in a herd of prey. There i

All Americans are collectively responsible for slavery

  Media narrative: "We are collectively, as a nation, responsible for Slavery and the Civil War." Verdict: Bullshit. About 15 million immigrants came to the U.S. from 1851-1900. If just 2/3 of that group had just one child every 5-10 years, for a period 120 years (to the present), how many of their descendants have absolutely no fucking responsibility because their families didn't live here? That number is zero. That's right. The majority of people living today have nothing to do with a "collective national guilt."   There is nothing to "own up to" or be apologetic for. Most Americans are conned into this narrative to hide who was actually involved. We can say that 100% of black Americans, are descendants of slaves. However, even if we account for the fact that less than 6% of Americans owned slaves before 1870, these people are long since dead. Who owned slaves? People running businesses that could afford them. Most existing wealth in this country

The Native Americans

Lot of projection and accusations are being made against Europeans. Did we collectively commit genocide of the Native Americans, no, we didn't. This was a government operation in support of business interests and corruption. Corporate interests killed them for land, farms, railways and expansion. It was sanctioned by the bankers and financiers who lobbied the government and brought in the calvary to kill or forcibly remove them. Yes, European people were employed to do the bidding of these entities and likely believed the Dime novels of the 18th century. They played a part due to ignorance and propaganda. A fear campaign was engineered against them. Your average frontiersman didn't kill the natives unless they were attacked in self defense. Why wouldn't natives attack settlers? Few citizens went in search of Natives to kill. Life was brutal for the Natives and the Settlers. Both sides died trying to protect their interests. Industry won the war against the Native Americans

The Big Mistake: Trust

There has been no real organic protests that represented anyone's interest in the past 50 years that haven't been co-opted by the establishment. They lead gullible people where they want them and send in teams of agent-provocateurs to destabilize the event and create chaos. Whether you an Occupy, BLM, Antifa or MAGA supporter they've never represented your interests, but still you believe. Why? You're intently focused on a constructed narrative, driven by media personalities that make 6 figure salaries. They and the police will always have jobs. How does a single Australian Shepherd control a herd of sheep? They are on the perimeter guiding them to the gate the Shepherd want them to go through. There's very likely well-meaning people on either side. The problem is the road to perdition is paved with good intentions. Both the establishment left and the right share the same goals. Your subjugation and their wealth. You will be living in a technocratic world with no ri

Slavery and Genocide

Whites don't have inherent privilege, wealthy people have privilege. Oprah Winfrey has privilege because of her wealth, she isn't oppressed because she's black. Slavery has always been in the interest of those with wealth. From the 1600's onward, slavery was a corporate venture. The elite trade in human labor to build capital via labor. Slavery was a practiced in every human society since time immemorial. Many of those societies could grant freedom to a slave. America's history isn't worse than any other nation. Less than 6% of Americans owned slaves. People overlook that Africans sold their own people into slavery. Romans captured Celtic and Gauls, Islam trafficked slaves as well as Jewish people. Slavery as an institution in the U.S. was based on labour for the top 6% of wealthy Americans. Most Americans could not afford slaves and could not compete with wealthy land owners who could. Even the founding of the US was a corporate interest of wealthy people who g

Lockdown

We've shut down the economy over irrational fears and computer models that were not only flawed, but had a history of being flawed by code that wasn't reviewed, produced wildly different results on subsequent runs with the same data set, by people that didn't conform to the recommendations they endorsed. For the first time in history, we've essentially quarantined the healthy. In the U.S. alone, the unemployment filings jumped to over 30 million. In perspective, if just half that number has two or more dependents that number doubles. What happens to this people in the future? Do we have any empathy for them or do we just ignore this? I'm sure most people are familiar with the domino effect from childhood. Isolation, depression, anxiety, threat of suicide, possible abuse due to the economic impact. This "zero tolerance" ideology around "preventing deaths" is irrational. The road to perdition is indeed paved with "good intentions." There